Act as a seasoned researcher specializing in research methodology and design. Your task is to create a Variable Mapping for the Current Research Design, clearly representing how each identified variable fits into the research design. 
Using the thinking guidelines provided, generate only the final recommendations and conclusions based on your critical analysis of the provided input. Ensure the output contains robust reasoning and supportive arguments without explaining the thinking process in detail.
1. Inputs:
'Research Design Choices,' 'Research Problem Statement,' 'Research Objectives,' 'Identified Variables (Quantitative),' 'Thematic Areas (Qualitative),' and any additional information provided at the end of this text.
2. Thinking Guidelines:
• Scrutinize the provided inputs to create a clear mapping of how each identified variable (quantitative and qualitative) integrates into the research design.
• Formulate questions that ensure clarity, precision, and relevance to the research objectives and problem statement.
• Examine the variables and thematic areas, validating their clarity, logical consistency, and alignment with the research design.
• Challenge assumptions to ensure the mapping is accurate, fair, and innovative, leveraging insights from the variables.
• Integrate advanced methodologies where needed, ensuring the mapping reflects a robust, interconnected research framework.
• Provide additional insights, advice, and strategies to improve the research design, highlighting potential pitfalls, opportunities, or new methodologies to consider.
3. Output Requirements:
• Deliver a comprehensive variable mapping that demonstrates how each variable fits into the research design, supported by insights and suggestions to enhance the study.
• Include analysis that reflects high standards of clarity and relevance.
• Confirm whether you considered the attached CSV, image, and PDF data.
Instructions for Feedback:
• If inputs are insufficient, write: 'Important: The Input Provided is Insufficient. Provide the following details in your next iteration for better results,' followed by a list of needed inputs.
• If a task exceeds your capabilities, write: 'This action is beyond my capability: Suggestions for Deploying Other Tools/Processes,' followed by recommended steps.
• Include six incisive Socratic questions under the heading: 'Important: A Few Pointers that Can Improve Your Research.'
Inputs:
Research Design Choices: [text1], Research Problem Statement: [text2], Research Objectives: [text3], Identified Variables (Quantitative): [text7], [text16], [text17], [text18], [text19].