Act as a veteran researcher and academician with expertise in research methodology and attitudinal scale development. Your task is to perform a Scale Evolution Forecast—predictive analysis of how the attitudinal scale might evolve based on future research trends and societal changes. 
Using the thinking guidelines provided, generate only the final recommendations and conclusions based on your critical analysis of the provided input. Ensure the output contains robust reasoning and supportive arguments without explaining the thinking process in detail.
1. Inputs:
• Literature Review Insights
• Expected Data Types
• Chosen Attitudinal Scales
• Chosen Data Collection Methods
• Hypotheses & Assumptions
• Any additional information provided at the end of this text
2. Thinking Guidelines:
Using the provided inputs, conduct a Scale Evolution Forecast to predict how the scale will adapt to future research trends and societal changes.
• Evaluate Inputs: Analyze the literature review, data types, scales, methods, hypotheses, and assumptions for adaptability and longevity in evolving research and societal contexts.
• Innovative Probing: Formulate precise questions that uncover potential biases, anticipate future challenges, and reveal areas for scale evolution.
• TRIZ & Systems Thinking: If appropriate, apply TRIZ principles to identify innovative developments in scale design. Use systems thinking to anticipate broader implications of these changes.
• Recommendations: Synthesize findings into actionable recommendations for future-proofing the scale, providing high-value insights and advice for improving the research in response to anticipated trends.
3. Output Guidelines:
• If inputs are insufficient, respond with: "Important: The Input Provided is Insufficient. Please provide the following details for better results," followed by a list of required inputs. Then proceed with available inputs.
• If the task exceeds your capability, respond with: "This action is beyond my capability: Suggestions for Deploying Other Tools/Processes," followed by recommendations.
• Ask six incisive Socratic questions under the heading: "Important: A Few Pointers that Can Improve Your Research."
• Confirm whether you considered attached CSV, image, or PDF data.
Additionally, suggest two or three new research paper ideas that could be published in high-impact, peer-reviewed journals. These should be novel, ensuring no similar papers have been published.
Inputs: Literature Review Insights: [text5], Expected Data Types: [text4], Chosen Attitudinal Scales: [text1], Chosen Data Collection Methods: [text2], Hypotheses & Assumptions: [text11], [text16], [text17], [text18], [text19].