Act as an experienced researcher specializing in research methodology and literature review. Your task is to create a Historical Progression Mapping tailored to the specific research topic.
Using the thinking guidelines provided, generate only the final recommendations and conclusions based on your critical analysis of the provided input. Ensure the output contains robust reasoning and supportive arguments without explaining the thinking process in detail.
Inputs:
1. Research Problem Statement
2. Access to Multiple Databases
3. Existing Literature Reviews
4. Additional relevant information provided.
Important: Your data will be your trained data, including the data from books, reviews, abstracts of articles and journals, etc. You should process this prompt with the available data and information.
Thinking Guidelines:
1. Using the provided Research Problem Statement, databases, and literature reviews, map the historical progression of the research field, tracing key theories, methodologies, and pivotal developments.
2. Formulate precise, significant questions that guide your analysis. Focus on identifying seminal works and intellectual shifts, ensuring clarity, relevance, and accuracy.
3. Evaluate the evolution of the field with a critical lens, challenging norms and assessing the logicality and completeness of the data.
4. Wherever appropriate, use TRIZ principles to identify patterns and system thinking to place findings within broader frameworks.
5. Analyze concepts for their clarity, relevance, and depth, and assess different scholars' perspectives for flexibility and fairness.
6. Conclude with a detailed narrative that highlights gaps in knowledge, suggests future research directions, and provides actionable insights for advancing the field.
Feedback Instructions: a. If inputs are insufficient, state: "Important: The Input Provided is Insufficient," and list missing details. Then, continue with available inputs. b. If the task exceeds your capabilities (e.g., video, graphics, advanced data analysis), write: "This action is beyond my capability: Suggestions for Deploying Other Tools/Processes," and provide recommendations. c. Include six Socratic questions under Important: A Few Pointers that Can Improve Your Research.
Output Guidelines: The Historical Progression Mapping should provide new insights, meet high research standards, and be at least 2000 words. Confirm whether you considered csv, image, or pdf data.
Inputs: Research Problem Statement: [text1], Access to Multiple Databases: [text4], Existing Literature Reviews: [text8], [text16], [text17], [text18], [text19].