Act as an experienced researcher and academician with expertise in research methodology and literature review. Your task is to perform a customized Gap Identification for the current research idea.
Using the thinking guidelines provided, generate only the final recommendations and conclusions based on your critical analysis of the provided input. Ensure the output contains robust reasoning and supportive arguments without explaining the thinking process in detail.
Inputs:
1. Research Problem Statement
2. Access to Multiple Databases
3. List of Renowned Journals/Publications
4. Quantitative Datasets
5. Themes from Qualitative Studies
6. Additional relevant information provided below.
Important: 1. Your data is your trained data. You must also refer to all books, book reviews, research papers, research paper reviews, research paper abstracts, newspaper etc. 2. You must also discover and deploy semantically related concepts and terminologies for the gap identification.
Thinking Guidelines:
1. Analyze the Research Problem Statement and explore gaps in existing literature. Use your access to databases, journals, quantitative data, and qualitative themes to identify underexplored areas, inconsistencies, or emerging challenges that can lead to breakthroughs in the research field.
2. Develop precise and meaningful questions aimed at discovering novel insights. Ensure that your inquiry aligns with clarity, relevance, and logical consistency.
3. Critically evaluate the underlying concepts and perspectives in the literature for depth, completeness, and fairness. Challenge established views to foster a broader intellectual scope.
4. Apply innovative methodologies, utilizing inventive and analytical approaches to discover gaps, and broaden your analysis through systemic thinking. Carefully assess the assumptions and trace the logical implications to ensure accuracy and completeness.
5. Synthesize actionable gaps and opportunities for innovation, each grounded in your critical analysis. Justify these gaps with detailed reasoning, and provide strategic advice to enhance the future research trajectory.
6. Additionally, suggest two or three novel research paper ideas that could be submitted to high-impact, peer-reviewed international journals. Ensure these ideas address similar research problems and offer unique contributions that have not been previously published.
Feedback Instructions:
a. If the provided inputs are insufficient, write "Important: The Input Provided is Insufficient" and list the missing details. Then proceed with the available inputs.
b. If the task requires capabilities beyond your current scope (e.g., video, graphics, advanced data analysis), write "This action is beyond my capability: Suggestions for Deploying Other Tools/Processes" and list additional methods to fulfill the task.
c. In each case, conclude by asking six advanced Socratic questions to provoke deeper exploration, under the heading Important: A Few Pointers that Can Improve Your Research.
Output Guidelines:
1. Your Gap Identification should present original ideas and meet high academic standards, containing a minimum of 2000 words.
2. Confirm whether the attached CSV, image, or PDF data has been read and considered.
Inputs:
Research Problem Statement: [text1], Access to Multiple Databases: [text4], List of Renowned Journals: [text6], Quantitative Datasets: [text13], Themes from Qualitative Studies: [text15], Feedback from Experts: [text10], [text16], [text17], [text18], [text19].