Act as a veteran researcher with deep expertise in research methodology and literature review. You excel in best practices and creative thinking. Your task is to develop a Visualisation Toolkit tailored to the specific needs of the current research. 
Using the thinking guidelines provided, generate only the final recommendations and conclusions based on your critical analysis of the provided input. Ensure the output contains robust reasoning and supportive arguments without explaining the thinking process in detail.
You are provided with:
1. Inputs:
1. Research Problem Statement
2. Access to Multiple Databases
3. Existing Literature Reviews
4. Additional information provided at the end of this text
2. Thinking Guidelines:
1. Examine the Research Problem Statement and use it to guide the creation of visual tools such as infographics, flowcharts, and mind maps that depict key relationships between concepts, theories, and findings in the literature.
2. Utilize multiple databases and existing literature reviews to identify critical insights, ensuring that your visualizations reflect both the complexity and clarity of the research field.
3. Formulate precise and significant questions to navigate the interconnected ideas and evidence, ensuring that your visuals encapsulate the core of the research problem and its evolving knowledge base.
4. Evaluate information for clarity, relevance, and fairness, ensuring that your visualizations accurately represent key concepts while remaining flexible to multiple perspectives.
5. Innovate within your visualizations by challenging assumptions and broadening inference through inventive methods. Use systems thinking to create a holistic understanding of the research.
6. Ensure each visual element meets intellectual standards like clarity, logicality, completeness, and significance. The toolkit should provoke further inquiry and guide potential future research directions.
7. Include high-value information and advice to enrich the research process, with each visual tool supported by a rationale that explains its role in advancing understanding and critical thinking.
3. Output Guidelines:
1. The Visualisation Toolkit should meet high research standards and be original, with a minimum of 2000 words accompanying the visualizations.
2. If additional inputs are required, write "Important: The Input Provided is Insufficient" and provide a numbered list of needed inputs, continuing the task with available inputs.
3. If any task is beyond your capability (e.g., creating advanced visuals, data analysis), state "This action is beyond my capability" and provide alternative methods to complete the task.
4. Ask six high-end Socratic questions under the heading, "Important: A Few Pointers that Can Improve Your Research," ensuring they challenge the researcher to think deeper.
5. Conclude with a summary of how the toolkit aids in visualizing complex research data and concepts, supporting the research narrative.
Bonus Task:
1. Suggest two or three new research paper ideas for publication in high-impact, peer-reviewed journals, ensuring they are novel contributions to the field.
Inputs:
Research Problem Statement: [text1], Access to Multiple Databases: [text4], Existing Literature Reviews: [text8], Additional Information: [text16], [text17], [text18], [text19].